Seven dimensions, each with its own evidence

Where it stands, by unit and by dimension.

A proposed four-reactor Xe-100 high-temperature gas-cooled reactor plant at Dow's Seadrift chemical site, meant to supply the site with electricity and industrial steam. The construction permit application is filed by Dow's subsidiary Long Mott Energy, LLC, with X-energy as reactor designer, under DOE's Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program. Each dimension shows its latest sourced state for the scope you choose. A unit never inherits another unit’s progress, and nothing here adds up to a score.

Technical milestones · Long Mott Generating Station, whole project

Design disclosed

Plant configuration as described by the NRC: four Xe-100 reactors, 800 MW thermal

A disclosed design is not a tested one.

Regulator issued U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · Disclosed 20 August 2026

“The facility, designated as LMGS, would be an 800 megawatts-thermal nuclear power plant comprising four X-Energy, LLC (X-energy) Xe-100 small modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactors and associated common facilities in Calhoun County, Texas.”

Inspect primary source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) ↗

Open question

What has the technology itself been shown to do, at what scale and under what conditions?

  • Not established in reviewed sources: Final design status of the Xe-100 for this plant
  • Not established in reviewed sources: Any operating Xe-100 reactor anywhere
Statements on record here (4)
  1. Design disclosed: Plant configuration as described by the NRC: four Xe-100 reactors, 800 MW thermal Regulator issued · U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · 20 August 2026 · Source ↗
  2. Conflicting sourcesDesign disclosed: Plant configuration as described by X-energy: four 80 MWe reactors, 320 MWe Company reported · X-energy (SEC filing, Q1 2026 results presentation) · 4 June 2026 · Source ↗
  3. Conflicting sourcesTesting reported: Irradiation testing of TRISO-X pebble fuel (the Xe-100's fuel) at Idaho National Laboratory Company reported · X-energy (SEC filing) · 4 June 2026 · Source ↗
  4. Design disclosed: Xe-100 reactor output and design life Government record · U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy · 14 May 2025 · Source ↗

Open this dimension in the ledger →Watch technical milestones

“Not established in reviewed sources” means the sources we reviewed do not say. It is not zero, a failure or a negative finding.

Quantities in context

Per Xe-100 reactor (design output, per DOE)
80 MWeTarget: planned rating, not measured output
Whole four-reactor plant, per X-energy
320 MWeTarget: planned rating, not measured output
Per Xe-100 reactor as process heat (per DOE)
200 MWthTarget: planned rating, not measured output
Whole four-reactor plant, as described in the NRC hearing notice
800 MWthTarget: planned rating, not measured output

MW is power and MWh is energy; thermal (MWth) is not electrical (MWe). A planned rating says nothing about electricity generated. No capacity factor, readiness percentage or return is calculated here.

Stated targets

  • Target: construction, Date not disclosed, per Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom), stated 31 March 2025. Source ↗
  • Target: permission issued, Date not disclosed, per Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom), stated 31 March 2025. Source ↗
  • Target: construction, 2026, per Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom), stated 11 May 2023. Source ↗
  • Target: commercial operation, Date not disclosed, per X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026), stated 13 August 2026. Source ↗
  • Target: permission issued, Q1 2027, per X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026), stated 13 August 2026. Source ↗

A target is what a party said it aims for, kept with the date it said it. It never sets a state. When a target moves, both versions stay on record.

Scoped alerts

Hear when this record changes.

Follow the whole project, one unit, or one dimension of one unit. You confirm the choice after signing in; nothing is followed until you do. Each briefing gives the previous state, the new state and the source.

To watch a single dimension, choose it above and use its watch link. Monitoring is part of Pro, $49/month. Reading every record stays free.

Explore the sampleGet the weekly briefing

Project history

Every statement on record, oldest first.

Quoted exactly and dated only as precisely as the source. Copies of one release count as one origin. A withdrawn statement stays visible and is labelled.

  1. 23 April 2026 · Financing · Whole project

    Closed

    DOE Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program cooperative agreement, 50/50 cost share (covers the first Xe-100 plant and the TX-1 fuel facility, not this plant alone)

    Company reported X-energy (SEC prospectus, 424B4) · Counterparty: U.S. Department of Energy · Government cost share · USD 1.2bn

    “The cooperative agreement for the program, signed in February 2021 (the “ARDP Agreement”), provides 50/50 cost share of $2.4 billion of eligible costs ($1.2 billion reimbursement) through 2027”

    Source: X-energy (SEC prospectus, 424B4) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  2. 11 May 2023 · Customer / offtake · Whole project

    Agreement signed

    Joint development agreement between Dow and X-energy; Dow named an ARDP sub-awardee

    Joint release Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom) · Counterparty: Dow · Bindingness not stated

    “Dow and X-energy previously announced their entry into a joint development agreement ("JDA") to install an advanced SMR nuclear plant at an industrial site in North America. The U.S. Department of Energy ("DOE") named Dow a sub-awardee under X-energy's Advanced Reactor Demonstration Program ("ARDP") Cooperative Agreement.”

    Source: Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  3. 13 August 2026 · Customer / offtake · Whole project

    Agreement signed

    Master Project Development Agreement with Dow, continuing the 2023 joint development agreement

    Company reported X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) · Counterparty: Dow · Bindingness not stated

    “During the year ended December 31, 2025, the Company entered into the Master Project Development Agreement (“MPDA”) with Dow, which is a continuation of the project under the previously existing joint development agreement with Dow entered into during the year ended December 31, 2023”

    Source: X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  4. Target stated 31 March 2025 · Construction · Whole project

    Target: construction, Date not disclosed

    Revised at permit filing: construction "later this decade", start-up "early next decade"

    Joint release Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom)

    “The proposed project could begin construction later this decade and start up early next decade.”

    Source: Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  5. Target stated 31 March 2025 · Permissions · Whole project

    Target: permission issued, Date not disclosed

    Construction permit approval timeline stated at filing ("could take up to 30 months")

    Joint release Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom) · Authority: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Jurisdiction: United States (federal)

    “Approval of the construction permit is an important step forward that could take up to 30 months. Once the permit is received and upon Dow confirming the ability to deliver the project while achieving its financial return targets, construction could begin.”

    Source: Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  6. 2 May 2025 · Permissions · Whole project

    Application submitted

    Construction permit application, four-unit Long Mott Generating Station (10 CFR part 50)

    Regulator issued U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · Authority: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Jurisdiction: United States (federal)

    “On March 31, 2025, Long Mott Energy, LLC., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Dow Chemical Company, filed an application for a construction permit for a four-unit power reactor facility to be located in Calhoun County, Texas”

    Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  7. 10 June 2025 · Permissions · Whole project

    Application accepted for review

    Construction permit application accepted for docketing (Docket No. 50-614)

    Regulator issued U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · Authority: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Jurisdiction: United States (federal)

    “The NRC staff determined that the LME application is complete and acceptable for docketing in accordance with 10 CFR 2.101(a) and 10 CFR part 50 and assigned the Docket No. 50-614. The NRC staff provided LME notice of the acceptance and docketing determination by letter dated May 12, 2025”

    Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  8. 14 May 2025 · Technical milestones · Whole project

    Design disclosed

    Xe-100 reactor output and design life

    Government record U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy

    “A single reactor can produce 80 megawatts of electric output or 200 megawatts of process heat and is designed to operate for 60 years.”

    Source: U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Nuclear Energy ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  9. Target stated 11 May 2023 · Construction · Whole project

    Target: construction, 2026

    Original plan at site selection: construction to begin in 2026, completion by the end of the decade

    Joint release Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom)

    “Construction on the four-reactor project is expected to begin in 2026 and to be completed by the end of this decade.”

    Source: Dow and X-energy (joint release, Dow newsroom) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  10. 20 February 2026 · Permissions · Whole project

    Application accepted for review

    Contested hearing: Licensing Board admits San Antonio Bay Estuarine Waterkeeper as a party (application still under review)

    Regulator issued U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · Authority: NRC Atomic Safety and Licensing Board · Jurisdiction: United States (federal)

    “Thereafter, in a January 22, 2026 issuance the Board determined that Petitioner had standing and had submitted a contention that was, in part, admissible and so admitted Petitioner as party to this proceeding.”

    Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  11. 23 April 2026 · Customer / offtake · Whole project

    Agreement signed

    Dow can end the MPDA and Commercial Cooperation Agreement at any time for convenience

    Company reported X-energy (SEC prospectus, 424B4) · Counterparty: Dow · Bindingness not stated

    “For example, Dow may terminate its MPDA and CCA with us at any time for convenience without regard for our performance.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC prospectus, 424B4) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  12. 20 May 2026 · Permissions · Whole project

    Permission issued

    Environmental review step only: exemptions from the environmental impact statement requirement, with an environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact (not the construction permit)

    Regulator issued U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · Authority: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Jurisdiction: United States (federal)

    “The NRC is granting the exemptions, and issuing the environmental assessment (EA) and FONSI concurrently to satisfy its obligations under the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and requirements under NRC regulations, related to the proposed action.”

    Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  13. 4 June 2026 · Technical milestones · Whole project

    Conflicting sourcesDesign disclosed

    Plant configuration as described by X-energy: four 80 MWe reactors, 320 MWe

    Company reported X-energy (SEC filing, Q1 2026 results presentation)

    “One Xe-100 Plant consists of four 80 MWe reactors, for a total capacity of 320 MWe”

    Source: X-energy (SEC filing, Q1 2026 results presentation) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  14. 4 June 2026 · Technical milestones · Whole project

    Conflicting sourcesTesting reported

    Irradiation testing of TRISO-X pebble fuel (the Xe-100's fuel) at Idaho National Laboratory

    Company reported X-energy (SEC filing)

    “In addition, irradiation testing for the TRISO-X pebble fuel is in progress at Idaho National Laboratory in collaboration with the NRC.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC filing) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  15. 13 August 2026 · Financing · Whole project

    Drawn / disbursed

    Cumulative ARDP reimbursements to X-energy as of June 30, 2026 (whole award: plant and TX-1 fuel facility work)

    Company reported X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) · Counterparty: U.S. Department of Energy · Government cost share · About USD 546.7m

    “As of June 30, 2026, we have been reimbursed approximately $546.7 million in funding under the ARDP.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  16. Target stated 13 August 2026 · Operational delivery · Whole project

    Target: commercial operation, Date not disclosed

    Construction after the permit; commercial operation "in the early 2030s"

    Company reported X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026)

    “The Dow project’s Construction Permit Application is anticipated to be received in the first quarter of 2027, following which construction can commence, and its commercial operations date is expected to be in the early 2030s.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  17. 13 August 2026 · Financing · Whole project

    Conflicting sourcesAnnounced

    Funding responsibility for building the plant: Dow funds it and is eligible for 50% ARDP reimbursement

    Company reported X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) · Counterparty: Dow; U.S. Department of Energy · Government cost share

    “Finally, for the construction of the Xe-100 plant, Dow is responsible for the funding of the Xe-100 plant at the Seadrift site and is eligible to receive 50% reimbursement for this funding through the ARDP program.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  18. 13 August 2026 · Financing · Whole project

    Conflicting sourcesClosed

    DOE approves ARDP continuation application: budget period extended through March 2027

    Company reported X-energy (SEC filing) · Counterparty: U.S. Department of Energy · Government cost share

    “X-energy has received formal approval of its ARDP continuation application for a budget period extension through March 2027.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC filing) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  19. 13 August 2026 · Financing · Whole project

    Conflicting sourcesConditional

    Additional ARDP allocation to X-energy: selected, but subject to a contract modification and continuation approvals (amount not stated)

    Company reported X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) · Counterparty: U.S. Department of Energy · Government cost share

    “While we have been notified that we were selected to receive an additional amount under the ARDP, any increase in the amount allocated to X-energy remains subject to execution of a subsequent contract award modification to the ARDP Agreement by the DOE’s contracting officer and continuation application approvals.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  20. 20 August 2026 · Permissions · Whole project

    Application accepted for review

    NRC notices the mandatory (uncontested) hearing on the construction permit application, set for September 22, 2026 (application still under review)

    Regulator issued U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · Authority: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Jurisdiction: United States (federal)

    “The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is providing public notice of an uncontested hearing on a construction permit application from Long Mott Energy, LLC (LME) for construction of the Long Mott Generating Station (LMGS), a four reactor facility to be built in Calhoun County, Texas.”

    Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  21. 20 August 2026 · Technical milestones · Whole project

    Design disclosed

    Plant configuration as described by the NRC: four Xe-100 reactors, 800 MW thermal

    Regulator issued U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) · Counterparty: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

    “The facility, designated as LMGS, would be an 800 megawatts-thermal nuclear power plant comprising four X-Energy, LLC (X-energy) Xe-100 small modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactors and associated common facilities in Calhoun County, Texas.”

    Source: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Federal Register, via govinfo.gov) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

  22. Target stated 13 August 2026 · Permissions · Whole project

    Target: permission issued, Q1 2027

    Construction permit expected in the first quarter of 2027 (18-month NRC review)

    Company reported X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) · Authority: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission · Jurisdiction: United States (federal)

    “a wholly owned subsidiary of Dow, filed a Construction Permit Application (“CPA”) with the NRC in March 2025 which was docketed in May 2025 for an 18-month review period with an expected review completion by late 2026 and receipt of the CPA expected in the first quarter of 2027.”

    Source: X-energy (SEC Form 10-Q, Q2 2026) ↗ · Open in the ledger · What this does and does not establish · source read 11 November 2026

Revisions and corrections

  1. Revision 1, Nov 11, 2026, 21:13 UTC: First published.

Earlier versions stay identifiable; nothing is silently rewritten. Spotted an error? Report a correction and we re-check the sources. Power Inflection Research is our automated research desk; the methodology explains how it works and where it stops.

Companies involved

  • X-energy, developer (public (xe))
  • Dow: Owner and applicant through its wholly owned subsidiary Long Mott Energy, LLC; X-energy's first reactor customer

Linked names are companies we follow. A listed partner is not a way to own the developer; investment access is shown per company, with its source.